Mary Davis on November 26, 2025 2:43 am This isn’t just about Hawaii. It’s a warning sign for all gun owners about how rights can be subtly taken away. Reply
Linda Thomas on November 26, 2025 2:45 am This feels like a tactic to avoid public backlash. Banning outright is too obvious, so they find a way to achieve the same result legally. Reply
Oliver Z. Moore on November 26, 2025 3:08 am It’s frustrating to see rights eroded in such a calculated way. Reply
Noah G. Brown on November 26, 2025 3:28 am Exactly. It’s the same old story—just a different angle this time. Reply
Olivia Moore on November 26, 2025 2:45 am The real question is: Will this actually improve public safety, or is it just another layer of government control? Reply
Elijah Hernandez on November 26, 2025 2:47 am I’m curious if this will lead to more legal challenges. It feels like a step too far, even for Hawaii. Reply
Emma C. Thomas on November 26, 2025 3:22 am Most likely. Every time rights are challenged, the courts get involved. Reply
Oliver Miller on November 26, 2025 3:34 am Hopefully, the courts will step in and stop this from spreading. Reply
Ava White on November 26, 2025 2:48 am Hawaii has always been strict on gun laws. This move doesn’t surprise me, but the method is interesting. Reply
James Johnson on November 26, 2025 2:48 am It’s remarkable how creative politicians can be when they want to restrict freedoms without facing direct opposition. Reply
Liam Jackson on November 26, 2025 2:49 am Would love to see legal experts weigh in on whether this strategy is constitutional or not. Seems like a gray area. Reply
James White on November 26, 2025 2:49 am I think this sets a dangerous precedent. Other states might see this as a blueprint for similar restrictions. Reply
James Lee on November 26, 2025 2:50 am This seems like a temporary solution until a full ban is passed. What’s the endgame here? Reply
Olivia Lopez on November 26, 2025 2:52 am It’s concerning how easily loopholes like this can be used to bypass public opinion. The public should be aware of these tactics. Reply
Jennifer Jackson on November 26, 2025 2:54 am If this isn’t a ban, then what is? It’s hard to see this as anything but a backdoor way to disarm law-abiding citizens. Reply
Lucas Davis on November 26, 2025 2:55 am This is an interesting loophole Hawaii found to restrict gun rights. Any thoughts on how other states might follow this approach? Reply
Elizabeth Williams on November 26, 2025 3:28 am It’s unsettling how laws can be manipulated this way. Gun owners everywhere should pay attention. Reply
Noah Jones on November 26, 2025 3:37 am This seems like a legal work-around rather than a direct ban. What’s the political motivation behind it? Reply
Robert Martinez on November 26, 2025 2:55 am Another example of how gun rights are being chipped away without outright bans. Hawaii’s method is particularly sneaky. Reply
Amelia Jones on November 26, 2025 3:18 am It’s not sneaky—it’s just how legislation works sometimes. It’s frustrating, but legal. Reply
Olivia Miller on November 26, 2025 3:19 am I disagree. Using permits as a way to restrict carries feels like a betrayal of the Second Amendment. Reply
Robert Martin on November 26, 2025 2:55 am The video seems like a must-watch for anyone concerned about gun rights. Thanks for sharing. Reply
Robert Martin on November 26, 2025 2:56 am I wonder how this will hold up in court. Previous cases seem to favor individual gun rights, so perhaps this won’t stand. Reply
23 Comments
This isn’t just about Hawaii. It’s a warning sign for all gun owners about how rights can be subtly taken away.
This feels like a tactic to avoid public backlash. Banning outright is too obvious, so they find a way to achieve the same result legally.
It’s frustrating to see rights eroded in such a calculated way.
Exactly. It’s the same old story—just a different angle this time.
The real question is: Will this actually improve public safety, or is it just another layer of government control?
I’m curious if this will lead to more legal challenges. It feels like a step too far, even for Hawaii.
Most likely. Every time rights are challenged, the courts get involved.
Hopefully, the courts will step in and stop this from spreading.
Hawaii has always been strict on gun laws. This move doesn’t surprise me, but the method is interesting.
It’s remarkable how creative politicians can be when they want to restrict freedoms without facing direct opposition.
Would love to see legal experts weigh in on whether this strategy is constitutional or not. Seems like a gray area.
I think this sets a dangerous precedent. Other states might see this as a blueprint for similar restrictions.
This seems like a temporary solution until a full ban is passed. What’s the endgame here?
It’s concerning how easily loopholes like this can be used to bypass public opinion. The public should be aware of these tactics.
If this isn’t a ban, then what is? It’s hard to see this as anything but a backdoor way to disarm law-abiding citizens.
This is an interesting loophole Hawaii found to restrict gun rights. Any thoughts on how other states might follow this approach?
It’s unsettling how laws can be manipulated this way. Gun owners everywhere should pay attention.
This seems like a legal work-around rather than a direct ban. What’s the political motivation behind it?
Another example of how gun rights are being chipped away without outright bans. Hawaii’s method is particularly sneaky.
It’s not sneaky—it’s just how legislation works sometimes. It’s frustrating, but legal.
I disagree. Using permits as a way to restrict carries feels like a betrayal of the Second Amendment.
The video seems like a must-watch for anyone concerned about gun rights. Thanks for sharing.
I wonder how this will hold up in court. Previous cases seem to favor individual gun rights, so perhaps this won’t stand.