SWAT comp USA versus CHINA. It was close but… Join me on my Patreon Make sure you like, … Watch full video on YouTube
Michael Rodriguez on October 30, 2025 3:36 pm The level of skill on display is both impressive and a bit nerve-wracking. Hope this spurs more collaboration. Reply
Mary N. Lee on October 30, 2025 4:11 pm Collaboration is key, but competition keeps everyone sharp. Reply
Liam Lopez on October 30, 2025 3:37 pm Competitions like this highlight the importance of training and technology in SWAT operations. Interesting to see how different countries approach these scenarios. Reply
Robert Martin on October 30, 2025 4:24 pm Agreed, it’s fascinating. Do you think the results would be similar in other types of tactical exercises? Reply
Amelia Jones on October 30, 2025 4:33 pm Training is key, but I wonder how much of the outcome was due to equipment differences. Reply
Isabella Garcia on October 30, 2025 3:37 pm Wondering if the results would be different in real-life urban environments versus controlled competition settings. Reply
James L. Rodriguez on October 30, 2025 4:26 pm Good point. Many factors come into play in real-world situations. Reply
Amelia Lee on October 30, 2025 3:38 pm Competitions like this are a reminder that no one has all the answers, and there’s always room for improvement. Reply
Liam Garcia on October 30, 2025 3:39 pm It’s great to see international cooperation in sharing tactical knowledge, even in competitive settings. Reply
Isabella Brown on October 30, 2025 3:41 pm I’d love to see more analysis on the tactics and strategies used by both teams in this competition. Reply
Isabella Johnson on October 30, 2025 4:16 pm Hopefully, they release some breakdowns after the event. Reply
Amelia Williams on October 30, 2025 3:41 pm What’s the impact of these competitions on future SWAT training programs in both countries? Reply
Mary B. Davis on October 30, 2025 4:24 pm They likely influence new techniques and best practices. Reply
Elizabeth Hernandez on October 30, 2025 4:34 pm Probably leads to more joint training initiatives as well. Reply
Elijah Jackson on October 30, 2025 3:44 pm Competitions like this often lead to the development of new equipment and techniques. Looking forward to the innovations. Reply
Olivia Martinez on October 30, 2025 3:46 pm Hopefully, they share the lessons learned with the broader tactical community. Reply
Linda K. Johnson on October 30, 2025 3:46 pm The pressure must have been intense. How do they prepare for these kinds of high-stakes shows? Reply
Robert Moore on October 30, 2025 3:46 pm It’s always interesting to see how different training philosophies play out in high-stakes competitions. Reply
Michael Johnson on October 30, 2025 3:59 pm Each approach has its strengths, but adaptability seems crucial. Reply
Lucas Williams on October 30, 2025 3:46 pm Close calls like this often drive both sides to improve. How often do these international competitions happen? Reply
Michael Lee on October 30, 2025 3:51 pm Not sure, but they’re rare enough to make headlines when they do. Reply
Mary Q. Martinez on October 30, 2025 3:46 pm Seeing different countries compete in this field is a great way to foster mutual respect and understanding. Reply
Isabella Jackson on October 30, 2025 3:59 pm Absolutely, and it’s beneficial for global security efforts. Reply
Mary Garcia on October 30, 2025 3:48 pm Kudos to both teams for pushing the limits in such high-pressure scenarios. Reply
Robert Thompson on October 30, 2025 3:55 pm Especially impressive given the stakes and the scrutiny they’re under. Reply
William Lopez on October 30, 2025 4:24 pm The commitment to excellence is what stands out the most. Reply
Lucas Jackson on October 30, 2025 3:48 pm It’s not just about winning; these competitions help identify areas for improvement. Reply
John Smith on October 30, 2025 3:50 pm Curious how the scoring was done. Was it purely performance-based or did strategy play a role? Reply
Robert G. Davis on October 30, 2025 3:49 pm Probably a combination of both, along with time and accuracy. Reply
33 Comments
The level of skill on display is both impressive and a bit nerve-wracking. Hope this spurs more collaboration.
Collaboration is key, but competition keeps everyone sharp.
Competitions like this highlight the importance of training and technology in SWAT operations. Interesting to see how different countries approach these scenarios.
Agreed, it’s fascinating. Do you think the results would be similar in other types of tactical exercises?
Training is key, but I wonder how much of the outcome was due to equipment differences.
Wondering if the results would be different in real-life urban environments versus controlled competition settings.
Good point. Many factors come into play in real-world situations.
Competitions like this are a reminder that no one has all the answers, and there’s always room for improvement.
Exactly, the best teams never stop learning.
It’s great to see international cooperation in sharing tactical knowledge, even in competitive settings.
Absolutely, it’s a win-win for everyone involved.
I’d love to see more analysis on the tactics and strategies used by both teams in this competition.
Hopefully, they release some breakdowns after the event.
What’s the impact of these competitions on future SWAT training programs in both countries?
They likely influence new techniques and best practices.
Probably leads to more joint training initiatives as well.
Competitions like this often lead to the development of new equipment and techniques. Looking forward to the innovations.
Hopefully, they share the lessons learned with the broader tactical community.
The pressure must have been intense. How do they prepare for these kinds of high-stakes shows?
Probably with intense drills and scenario training.
It’s always interesting to see how different training philosophies play out in high-stakes competitions.
Each approach has its strengths, but adaptability seems crucial.
Close calls like this often drive both sides to improve. How often do these international competitions happen?
Not sure, but they’re rare enough to make headlines when they do.
Seeing different countries compete in this field is a great way to foster mutual respect and understanding.
Absolutely, and it’s beneficial for global security efforts.
Kudos to both teams for pushing the limits in such high-pressure scenarios.
Especially impressive given the stakes and the scrutiny they’re under.
The commitment to excellence is what stands out the most.
It’s not just about winning; these competitions help identify areas for improvement.
True, the insights gained are invaluable.
Curious how the scoring was done. Was it purely performance-based or did strategy play a role?
Probably a combination of both, along with time and accuracy.