NRA President Bachenberg in October announced some changes coming to the Association. In the days since, more members have been clamoring about magazine distribution changes and he’s recently addressed them.
Changes that NRA President Bill Bachenberg discussed in October included streamlining NRA Publications into a new division, NRA Media. Members can expect to continue to receive high quality editorial and articles from the Association, however how they consume that information is changing. Under NRA Media, the four hard copy magazines that were available have been minimized to two. The remaining magazines will be “American Rifleman” and “American Hunter,” with distribution changing from monthly to quarterly. All the other content that members were accustomed to will be available online.
Bachenberg recently addressed these changes as more and more members have been expressing their opinions on the topic. Bachenberg sent a message to the entire Board of Directors for them to distribute as they see fit. Via email, Bachenbarg told Bearing Arms that the message “went to the board without restriction for the members” and he encouraged directors to share it.
“There has been a lot of chatter on the magazine changes,” Bachenberg told Bearing arms. “Here is some background for your readers.”
Bachenberg’s letter opened by explaining that many members have asked why the changes were necessary. He continued by explaining that had the NRA kept up with inflation since the 90’s, a current annual membership would cost $62.00 and life membership would be $3,700.00. However, an annual membership is “as low as $35” and a life membership is still $1,500.00 — the same as it was in the 1990s.
“For around 10 cents a day, your annual member dues help defend your God-given Second Amendment rights and provide great programs in Education & Training, Women & Youth programs, Edie Eagle®, Refuse to be a Victim® and Women-On-Target® to name a few, plus a great magazine,” Bachenberg said. “NRA has been producing a magazine starting in 1885 called ‘The Rifle’ that continues today as the ‘American Rifleman.’ ‘American Hunter’ was first published in October of 1973. During the 1980s and ’90s the NRA published additional targeted magazines.
“Back then, paper and postage was relatively cheap, and gas was 36 cents a gallon. Today paper is about six to seven times more expensive, and a first-class stamp went from 6 cents to 78 cents, a 13 times increase. NRA has been subsidizing the cost of production for the magazines for many years, it has now gotten to a point that we cannot in good conscious continue funding the magazines instead of fully funding our programs that members are demanding.”
Bachenberg reiterated that it was not an easy choice in how to close the gap between publishing costs “without significantly increas[ing] membership dues or charging [an additional] 20 plus dollars for a magazine subscription.” While Bachenberg admits that he’s part of the older generation who’s more accustomed to hard copy magazines, he’s excited about and hopeful that the changes will create a more meaningful experience for Association members, especially the younger generations of gun owners.
“What is exciting about digital magazines is that we can include video and sound in the articles,” Bachenberg wrote. “Your digital experience can now contain more current news, not news that is two months old due to publishing deadlines. Our advertisers can now advertise like on TV instead of one-dimensional paper ads.”
Bachenberg’s letter ended with:
As we have publicized, the publication group at NRA will be moving content from the discontinued magazines to the American Rifleman or the American Hunter and to the digital delivery format, so not all is lost. We knew for some this would not be popular, but we had to make the hard decisions so we could still publish a paper magazine, maybe not on the frequency you were used to, but you are getting a paper magazine four times a year when most organizations have discontinued their magazine.
Again, while this was a gut wrenching decision, we believe it was made in the best interest of the members. Please give the digital format a try on your computer or mobile device.
Change is inevitable for any group or organization if they wish to survive. The National Rifle Association — and their members — has been through a lot in the last half-decade or so. Under the leadership of solid reform-minded officers, directors, and executive-level employees, the Association has turned a much needed page in their history and members should accept these new promises with hopeful optimism.
For members who are interested in interacting in a more direct manner with NRA President Bill Bachenberg, he’s launched his own website, NRAPresident.com. There, verified members can get access to many documents, a historical explanation on the NRA’s current status, as well as Bachenberg’s responses to some frequently asked questions he’s received since sharing his email address with the members at large.
Editor’s Note: To celebrate Christmas and ring in 2026, Bearing Arms is matching our biggest sale ever on VIP memberships. Now through January 1, until 11:59 pm PT, receive 74% off a VIP membership using promo code MERRY74!
Read the full article here

37 Comments
It’s a shame to see the other magazines go, but at least the NRA is keeping two strong publications.
Exactly. The NRA has a responsibility to maintain quality content for its members.
It’s disappointing to see fewer print options, but I’ll give the digital format a chance before passing judgment.
Same here. The content is what matters most, not the format.
It’s a shame to lose the other two magazines, but I understand the need to consolidate resources.
Hopefully, the digital content will be as comprehensive and well-researched as the print editions were.
Two magazines are better than none, but I’ll miss the variety of the previous lineup.
I wonder if they’ll ever revive the other titles in a different format.
I’m skeptical. Cutting print editions feels like a way to save money, not necessarily improve member experience.
Maybe, but it’s also about reaching younger audiences who prefer digital content.
I hope they’re transparent about the reasons behind the decision.
The NRA should ensure that all online content is easily accessible, including for members with limited tech skills.
Good point. Accessibility should be a priority in any digital shift.
This seems like a positive change—focusing on two high-quality publications is better than spreading resources too thin.
I agree, but I hope they keep the best writers and editors from the previous magazines.
I’m just glad they’re keeping *American Rifleman*—it’s been a staple for so long.
Change is hard, but necessary in today’s digital age. Hope the transition goes smoothly for members.
I just hope they prioritize accessibility—some older members may struggle with the shift.
Interesting to see how the NRA is adapting to digital media while maintaining some print presence. Curious how this will impact member engagement.
I think the shift could streamline operations, but I hope the quality of the content doesn’t suffer.
I wonder if this is a cost-cutting measure or a genuine effort to modernize.
Has the NRA considered offering digital subscriptions for those who still want the print experience?
That would be a great compromise, but I doubt they’d incur the extra costs.
The reduction in print magazines seems like a missed opportunity for collectors who value the physical editions.
True, but online content is more accessible and eco-friendly. Maybe a hybrid approach could work.
Another step in the slow death of print media. I wonder how long before other organizations follow suit.
It’s inevitable, but I’ll still miss the feel of a good magazine in my hands.
I’m not thrilled about the changes, but if the digital content is well-executed, it could work out well.
Optimism is key. Let’s give it a chance before making final judgments.
This seems like a logical step for the NRA, aligning with trends in media consumption.
It’s about time. Many organizations have already made similar changes.
Change is inevitable, but I wish the NRA had given members more notice before making this decision.
Too late now, but hopefully the communication improves going forward.
I’m curious how the quarterly schedule will work. Will there be more content per issue or just less frequent updates?
Good question. I hope they clarify that soon.
I hope the digital edition includes archival access to past issues of the discontinued magazines.
That would be a fantastic feature—preserving the history is important.