My home state of Georgia is pretty good on guns. We could be better, sure, but we’re also a lot better than some supposedly pro-gun states. I’m looking at you, Texas.
However, we’ve got two very anti-gun senators. While Raphael Warnock isn’t up for re-election this time around, Jon Ossoff is.
While he’s better at keeping his mouth shut compared to Warnock–or the media just doesn’t like him as much–he’s the guy on the ballot this November, and there’s a bit of a disparity between his own policies and the flocking of gun companies to the state he represents.
As major gun manufacturers relocate from Virginia to Georgia over firearm regulations, constitutional experts told the Daily Signal that the increasing momentum for left-leaning policies in the Peach State could jeopardize the manufacturers’ new home.
Their remarks come as Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., runs for reelection and former Atlanta Mayor , who is endorsed by former President Joe Biden, eyes the governor’s mansion.
Polls show that both candidates have a favorable chance of winning their respective seats.
“From the policy perspective, every time you have elected officials in office that are not protecting the Second Amendment, one runs the risk of losing ground to their policies,” Zack Smith, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation’s Institute for Constitutional Government, told the Daily Signal.
…
While Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp welcomed the move, saying his state “endures support for constitutional freedoms,” Republican political operatives say Ossoff’s anti-gun stance could jeopardize future moves by gun manufacturers.
“Whether it’s stripping law-abiding citizens of their right to safely own firearms, or protecting criminal illegals like Laken Riley’s killer, Jon Ossoff always puts the radical Left first,” National Republican Study Committee spokesman Nick Puglia told the Daily Signal.
I’d love to be able to say that these polls are wrong, but considering how Warnock and Ossoff both won their seats in the first place, and Warnock defended it to get a full term in the Senate, I can’t.
And that’s definitely going to be troubling for some of these businesses that have come to Georgia for a more friendly environment. Moves from one state to another aren’t exactly cheap and easy. It’s bad enough when you’re moving a household. A business is another matter, as you have to move at least some key employees, all your equipment, and re-establish yourself in your new location with new hires, training them up, and try to do it without missing a beat for your customers.
That’s no easy task.
So, when they’re here, they’re here, and if the regulatory environment changes, it’s not easy to correct the issue.
While Keisha Lance Bottoms would be more of a problem for gun companies that came to the Peach State, Ossoff’s re-election would be a signal that Bottoms’s winning wouldn’t be some aberration, as if voters just didn’t like Rick Jackson. It would be a signal that the state may be rolling blue, and that’s bad news.
If there’s good news here, it’s that the state is currently districted in such a way that it’s unlikely a Governor Bottoms would be able to do what Abigail Spanberger and company did in Virginia. There just isn’t a case where the legislature would be willing to go along with a gun control agenda like that, and redistricting isn’t on the table for Bottoms, either.
Still, it’s not great news for folks like me who live here.
Editor’s Note: President Trump and Republicans across the country are doing everything they can to protect our Second Amendment rights and right to self-defense.
Help us continue to report on their efforts and legislative successes. Join Bearing Arms VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Read the full article here

39 Comments
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Production mix shifting toward USA might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Production mix shifting toward USA might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.